how do i activate my cash app card



  • activate cash app card
    how to activate cash app card
    cash app card activation
    cash app help activate card
    how do i activate my cash app card
    how to activate my cash app card
    cash app activate card
    cash app activation
    how to activate a cash app card
    how to activate your cash app card
    activate my cash app card
    how to activate cash app card without qr code
    how to activate my cash app card without qr code



  • @'Kalbur':

    @'Nuke':

    @'Veneri':

    @'fredfred5150':

    …For me its gape/gaping...why anybody wants to see the inside of a rectal canal is beyond me.

    One-sided fetishes bore me - those where only the one person is being aroused/satisfied. I know of no erogenous zones located in the throat, or in the hands or feet, and as much as I enjoy the concept of a tit-fuck, it's not possible to give a woman an orgasm that way.
    Obviously if both parties are reciprocating (i.e. 69) then that's different, but I see no appeal to the endless stream of material where just one person in a pairing is achieving orgasm (this also applies to scenes where multiple cocks are being serviced by one person, and that person is not being serviced in turn).
    To me it indicates the one who's getting off is unable to satisfy their partner, or they just don't care if their partner gets off. If that's your point of view, you may as well beat your own meat.

    Hi, I'm a long time lurker, and aspiring 3d artist and I simply had to reply to this. You obviously have a very developed and well thought out opinion on the matter, which I respect greatly, and I can't find fault with any of it with the exception of this excerpt.

    Now while it can't be argued that there ARE erogenous zones in the throat (Or wherever for that matter) I would like to point out that sexual pleasure isn't purely physical stimulation.

    Many women, my wife being one of them, actually enjoy the empowering sensation of a blowjob as they get to "control" their/my pleasure (Hell I don't pretend to understand it) and the few times I've gone into depth about this topic with women who DO claim to enjoy blowjobs they agree.

    Plus I like to practice oral on my significant other, and it gives me immense satisfaction. It makes me feel like I know her better than anyone else, and that she's trusting me with her pleasure.

    So the point I'm trying to make is that you can't just associate sexual satisfaction with purely physical stimulation. In my opinion, it is much more than a culmination of nerves and actions. It's also a psychological and emotional stimulation.

    I don't mean to start an argument or be abrasive, I just wanted to throw my two cents in =x

    Now, in an attempt to stay relevant to the topic one fetish that I wish would go away is scat. I'm a man that enjoys my pornographic releases, and there is nothing worse than when you're enjoying a scene and BAM, something comes out of an orifice that shouldn't be done there. Just ruins my whole night.

    And you make valid points. If, as you say, the person giving head gets non-sexual satisfaction from it, then they are enjoying it in their own way, whether it's the feeling of control over their partner or the subtle nuances of nerve endings, or the feeling that you're making someone else happy.



  • NTR and/or Cheating - most people know hentai tend to dislike this, me included.

    Furry/MLP - i just don't get it why and how people can take pleasure in such thing… no offence tho, since i respect all tastes.

    bondage - i like raped/forced (only in porn ofc) but there is something about bondage that just really aint turned me on :P.

    Shitting/pooping - just god no...



  • @'Nuke':


    The thing with anal IMO is that a condom should be used to guard against the bacteria. At least in real life. It's also not a bad idea to wash it out prior to the activity, though this mostly removes solid material, and not so much the bacteria. Then again, how much more bacteria is there in the rectum than the mouth? Probably an ass-load.

    :D:D:D:D:D:D:D



  • @'fredfred5150':

    Obviously we all like porn here but is there one fetish you want to erase from the pornsphere?

    For me its gape/gaping…why anybody wants to see the inside of a rectal canal is beyond me.

    Same here man. I just don't get it.



  • @'Nuke':

    @'Veneri':

    @'fredfred5150':

    …For me its gape/gaping...why anybody wants to see the inside of a rectal canal is beyond me.

    One-sided fetishes bore me - those where only the one person is being aroused/satisfied. I know of no erogenous zones located in the throat, or in the hands or feet, and as much as I enjoy the concept of a tit-fuck, it's not possible to give a woman an orgasm that way.
    Obviously if both parties are reciprocating (i.e. 69) then that's different, but I see no appeal to the endless stream of material where just one person in a pairing is achieving orgasm (this also applies to scenes where multiple cocks are being serviced by one person, and that person is not being serviced in turn).
    To me it indicates the one who's getting off is unable to satisfy their partner, or they just don't care if their partner gets off. If that's your point of view, you may as well beat your own meat.

    Hi, I'm a long time lurker, and aspiring 3d artist and I simply had to reply to this. You obviously have a very developed and well thought out opinion on the matter, which I respect greatly, and I can't find fault with any of it with the exception of this excerpt.

    Now while it can't be argued that there ARE erogenous zones in the throat (Or wherever for that matter) I would like to point out that sexual pleasure isn't purely physical stimulation.

    Many women, my wife being one of them, actually enjoy the empowering sensation of a blowjob as they get to "control" their/my pleasure (Hell I don't pretend to understand it) and the few times I've gone into depth about this topic with women who DO claim to enjoy blowjobs they agree.

    Plus I like to practice oral on my significant other, and it gives me immense satisfaction. It makes me feel like I know her better than anyone else, and that she's trusting me with her pleasure.

    So the point I'm trying to make is that you can't just associate sexual satisfaction with purely physical stimulation. In my opinion, it is much more than a culmination of nerves and actions. It's also a psychological and emotional stimulation.

    I don't mean to start an argument or be abrasive, I just wanted to throw my two cents in =x

    Now, in an attempt to stay relevant to the topic one fetish that I wish would go away is scat. I'm a man that enjoys my pornographic releases, and there is nothing worse than when you're enjoying a scene and BAM, something comes out of an orifice that shouldn't be done there. Just ruins my whole night.



  • @'Veneri':

    @'fredfred5150':

    …For me its gape/gaping...why anybody wants to see the inside of a rectal canal is beyond me.

    Well, we can accept that what you will see will be dark and dirty :huh:! The part that boggles me is burying your cock into that dark and dirty bacterial abyss! :huh: :huh: :huh:

    Drop those fetishes that make sex disgusting and bring back that wholesome goodness of romantic, erotic affection with a good old story, as it was meant to be, and give me back my imagination and fantasies.:shy:

    I do also prefer more of a story than straight-out boning. I don't need to see penetration, as long as it's properly inferred (it looks like they're having sex). However, it also depends on the context. In Meet Joe Black, I felt the sex scene went on a bit long for the type of movie it was. The concept of Death taking human form and experiencing human sex for the first time in eternity is irrelevant - it's a love scene that went on entirely too long IMO for the context in which it was presented.

    However, the old '50s cliché of "lights go out, camera pans away, fade to black, then we see the guy putting on his boots while the chick covers up with the sheet" to infer sex does nothing for me. I want to see action, but don't require x-ray, POV, or money shots.

    However, these elements are difficult to avoid in 3DX - you have "willing" models. Or at the very least, they have no opinion in the matter, so the artist can decide how much or how little to show without the complications of a living actor who may not agree to a given scene in real life. Given that level of freedom and the level of detail of hi-res photo-based textures, why would anyone not go all-out?

    The thing with anal IMO is that a condom should be used to guard against the bacteria. At least in real life. It's also not a bad idea to wash it out prior to the activity, though this mostly removes solid material, and not so much the bacteria. Then again, how much more bacteria is there in the rectum than the mouth? Probably an ass-load.

    One-sided fetishes bore me - those where only the one person is being aroused/satisfied. I know of no erogenous zones located in the throat, or in the hands or feet, and as much as I enjoy the concept of a tit-fuck, it's not possible to give a woman an orgasm that way.
    Obviously if both parties are reciprocating (i.e. 69) then that's different, but I see no appeal to the endless stream of material where just one person in a pairing is achieving orgasm (this also applies to scenes where multiple cocks are being serviced by one person, and that person is not being serviced in turn).
    To me it indicates the one who's getting off is unable to satisfy their partner, or they just don't care if their partner gets off. If that's your point of view, you may as well beat your own meat.

    Rape is rape, no matter how it's presented, and I don't believe that such fetish porn helps in any way to reduce the likelihood of it happening IRL. Same with kiddie porn. Those who are drawn to it think about it, and if they feel they are presented with the opportunity in real life will attempt it.

    The concept of one figure penetrating another figure that is half its size is also questionable, IMO. From my perspective, it's allegorical of child rape.

    Scat, puke, snot, golden showers, skullfucking, necro, pregnant chicks, bondage, snuff/gore, animals or furries I just cannot see the appeal of. I don't want to see the appeal of it.

    The Lolita stuff is borderline, IMO. As any male knows, when puberty hits and you experience your first erections and ejaculations, you're hooked. Certainly females have similar experiences at the same age. However, sexual awakening does not include emotional and mental maturity nor a sense of responsibility in either gender, and one is just as likely to find a horny teenage girl as a horny teenage guy.

    The possession or creation of such content by those of adult age, however, is where the problem lies, at least with those in the legal profession.

    The Lolita mythos is that the 13-17 year old female is sexually active and seeks the encounter and experience, and is open to and accepting of all offers. IRL, some see it as "looking for love through sex" and others see it as "when girls grow up into women". Whether this is the result of childhood sexual and mental abuse, peer pressure, or innate natural desire, is as much a coin-flip in reality as anything else.

    It's fashionable in civilized culture to sweep the notion of those under 18 being sexually able and active under the rug, and to pretend that there is in fact a universal age at which one magically achieves emotional and mental maturity, and only at that point are they capable of making the "right choices" regarding sex.

    There is zero evidence to support this concept.

    In truth, many women still cling to childhood fantasies of "Prince Charming" - landing the handsome and rich husband - well into their 40s and beyond, and many men still see themselves as studs well into their 60s, even when presented with a ton of evidence to the contrary.



  • @'thehawkman':

    Amputation and gore/snuff (is that what the latter is called?). There is a guy who has a long running series where the main character's alternate endings involve getting burned alive, impaled, decapitated, limbs sawn off etc. That seems a bit much even for me, and I've seen pretty much everything. And I really fail to see the attraction. Same goes for vore.

    Perils of Carey by Studio_AD? Brilliant stuff :) Anyway, didn't know what "vore" is, thanks for pointing me to that.

    As for the topic - don't have one i guess. Kinda on the side "let em watch whatever they want, as there is a big chance that if they wank to it in home, they wont do it for real". Popculture/extreme porn as a method of releasing the steam out of system.

    Fetish related - I'm kinda pissed that Visa/MC/Paypal dictates me what can I buy with my money. In other topic you're discussing resurface of extreme ideologies. I'm not THAT worried about them. I'm worried about the return of puritanism.



  • @'thehawkman':

    Amputation and gore/snuff (is that what the latter is called?). There is a guy who has a long running series where the main character's alternate endings involve getting burned alive, impaled, decapitated, limbs sawn off etc. That seems a bit much even for me, and I've seen pretty much everything. And I really fail to see the attraction. Same goes for vore.

    This! x1000 :-/



  • @'fredfred5150':

    …For me its gape/gaping...why anybody wants to see the inside of a rectal canal is beyond me.

    Well, we can accept that what you will see will be dark and dirty :huh:! The part that boggles me is burying your cock into that dark and dirty bacterial abyss! :huh: :huh: :huh:

    Drop those fetishes that make sex disgusting and bring back that wholesome goodness of romantic, erotic affection with a good old story, as it was meant to be, and give me back my imagination and fantasies.:shy:





  • A few things off the top of my head…

    Lolicon, like mentioned above. That is so wrong in so many ways and there is no justification to make it seem any better.

    Foot fetishes. I don't understand it, I just don't. Stinky, weird looking feet is something to get off to...eeesh.

    Poop/pee and pretty much anything related to that kind of disgusting material. It baffles me that things like this even exist and need an explanation.



  • pissing… it's just gross



  • @'EmEn':

    But what's weird to me is listening to some My Little Pony fetishists bend over backwards trying to explain how they're not furries and don't want to be associated with furry fandom, despite the fact that they're literally fapping to anthropomorphic horses wielding horse dicks.

    Seems like there's some cognitive dissonance there.

    Its the same for me when I hear about futa fans fapping to muscular futa's and claiming to be hetero :D



  • This thread is bound to rustle jimmies :D

    My Little Pony fetishes (clopping) , which seems to go hand in hand with furries.

    I can never understand it, try as I may. And it's worse for me when an artist I enjoyed suddenly out of the blue shifts to doing pony porn complete with the repulsing addition of audio from the show (blackjrxiii lately comes to mind -_- ' ). There's not too many things I'd up and abandon an artist over, but that one is easily close to the top of the short list.

    That being said, I respect fetishes, everyone has their own thing that gets them off. It's why I tolerate footjobs even though there's zero part of my brain that can sympathize. Heck I'm a huge fan of futa which certainly isn't mainstream either. I'm pretty happy Miro shares that interest, otherwise there would be a lot less to look forward to on that front.

    But what's weird to me is listening to some My Little Pony fetishists bend over backwards trying to explain how they're not furries and don't want to be associated with furry fandom, despite the fact that they're literally fapping to anthropomorphic horses wielding horse dicks.

    Seems like there's some cognitive dissonance there. People really shouldn't feel compelled to defend a fetish they enjoy (within reason), but I hate it when people throw something else equally as absurd under the bus, acting like they're above someone else's erotic interests:

    " Look I'm not THAT crazy"

    Regardless, it's always explained with neuroscience. "They're anthropomorphic, which to the brain is all that you need in order to provoke a lustful response." Yeah, that explains the "how" but it doesn't explain the "why". Why, when given a choice of preference between human beings and horsepeople (or any other animal) some chose the animalistic version every time.

    And that part never seems to get explained properly, beyond "They like to fap to animals", which is an inherently offensive conclusion many of the fandom seem to take offense to.

    It's really the defensiveness I guess that I take issue with the most, rather than the fetish itself.



  • The deviant, horrifyingly common fetish glorified as "lolicon". Unlike fantasy violence, even in the context of erotica, lolicon is genuinely harmful regardless of whether it inspires real actions; it still contributes to the sexualization of minors and the psychological illness of pedophilia, and gives ammo to moral crusaders seeking to give lovers of drawn erotica, particularly from the East, a bad name. I would be OK with Japan censoring genitalia if they'd just censor truly vile stuff like that as well, but they don't, and I have to be suspicious of any anime girl with less than an F-cup.



  • Amputation and gore/snuff (is that what the latter is called?). There is a guy who has a long running series where the main character's alternate endings involve getting burned alive, impaled, decapitated, limbs sawn off etc. That seems a bit much even for me, and I've seen pretty much everything. And I really fail to see the attraction. Same goes for vore.



  • I would say that having sex with corpses is probably the worst imo and also frotteurism.



  • For me it definitely would be the balloon popping fetish. My inability to understand what the fascination is, adding to the fact that I am one of those people who cannot stand the sound when you rub a balloon, makes this my most disliked type of porn. The sound is worse than nails on the chalkboard to me. And don't even ask me about the clown sex porn. :s



  • Furry

    I honestly think I'd be more comfortable finding out a friend is a serial killer or a child rapist than finding out they're a furry.


Log in to reply
 

Looks like your connection to NodeBB was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.