responsive web design company



  • Inovies is one of the leading responsive web design company,ecommerce website design services,ecommerce website design company,web design packages,responsive web design company,ecommerce website design services in 2020,ecommerce website development company, website designing and web development company in Hyderabad. Scale your business with secure and open-source e-commerce development platform. We exclusively offer WhatsApp Chat on your website, Full Security, Hosting & SSL. We have served 50+ Industries with more than 2000+ clients, our design helps you get leads. Get a fully dynamic & responsive eCommerce website in an affordable budget. We develop customized CRM for all type of business.Maximize your product sales by developing custom eCommerce websites in an online market.contact now +040 40273049.For more visit https://www.inovies.com/web-design/ecommerce-website-design-company



  • @'fredfred5150':

    can you call enjoying traps exclusive hetero?

    I think yes, for the same reasons that shemale and futa porn are. As long as it's a 'cute' trap: has a hot body, breasts (real or fake), feminine voice, etc.

    If you're looking at a straight up dude with a wig or someone who just barely earned an 'E for Effort' in the lady department then, uh, that raises some questions.



  • @'zanzoxxx':

    IMO, you start with a 2D drawing or 3d render of a female. You pose it in the most erotic way you can. Then at the very end you throw a penis in which results in a mind fuck. This can easily turn on a straight man because 95% of the art is female while 5% of the canvas has a penis in it attached to the female.

    Now let's take real life photography. You take a photo of a shemale. 99% of the time the shemale still retains masculine features in addition to seeing their penis. It's just not the same since the 2d/3d art can portray an exact replica of a female while in real life most shemales still retain masculine features.

    In 2D or 3D art you can blend the perfect female representation with a penis thrown in at the end which creates the ideal "trap".

    I guess that's one way to put it, but I feel what makes traps traps is a certain degree of gender ambiguity. Bodily areas of definitive gender (such as breasts) are reduced to a nebulous scale. They're not supposed to be transgendered, but more a femme transvestite: The trap is that it is a disguise.



  • Asians.



  • @'fredfred5150':

    Ok so we know Futas are female with the addition of a penis, so its exclusively hetero (albeit alittle kinky)

    But what about "traps"? can you call enjoying traps exclusive hetero?

    Explain the trap, its appeal and how it fits into the definition of your sexuality

    IMO, you start with a 2D drawing or 3d render of a female. You pose it in the most erotic way you can. Then at the very end you throw a penis in which results in a mind fuck. This can easily turn on a straight man because 95% of the art is female while 5% of the canvas has a penis in it attached to the female.

    Now let's take real life photography. You take a photo of a shemale. 99% of the time the shemale still retains masculine features in addition to seeing their penis. It's just not the same since the 2d/3d art can portray an exact replica of a female while in real life most shemales still retain masculine features.

    In 2D or 3D art you can blend the perfect female representation with a penis thrown in at the end which creates the ideal "trap".



  • @'Theblissofsin':

    @'Tiffany':

    The ideal species, honestly, would be a futanari one. Just one gender. Anyone could hook up with anyone. The mating pool would open up over night from roughly 50% of the population as potential mates to 100%. From an evolutionary point of view, it'd be much more advantageous and I'm surprised we evolved with two genders rather than just the one.

    It's really rather simple as to why we have two genders. There are plenty of examples of one-gendered species in nature but their reproduction doesn't create new gene sequences, meaning that they are more susceptible to disease and other things that threaten survival. A double parent structure creates a situation in which different gene sequences come together to spawn a new one that is better armed against viruses/bacteria.

    So from an evolutionary point of view a monogendered species is definitely more of a curse than a blessing.

    It'd be a hermaphrodite species, having both genders. Don't confuse gender with sexual reproduction. Combining male and female into one package wouldn't make a species asexual.

    What you're talking about is an all female species that reproduces with something like parthenogenesis and that's simply not the case with what I'm talking about.



  • @'Theblissofsin':

    So from an evolutionary point of view a monogendered species is definitely more of a curse than a blessing.

    on that subjet; a nice lil serie, with a very nice voice over :)
    http://youtu.be/89rQDlx5MXA

    also check out http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Sex

    The evolution of sexual reproduction has been a mystery to scientists ever since Darwin mentioned the mysteries and problems of it in The Origin of Species. However, since that time, advances in genetics have shone light on how, and perhaps why, the evolution of reproduction occured. Firstly, a shuffled genetic deck is harder for viruses to latch on to; viruses typically look for stretches of DNA with a specific sequence, and if that sequence happens to cross a recombination boundary in a sexually-reproducing species the virus will be out of luck. Secondly, organisms engaging in sexual reproduction can evolve at a faster rate, being able to create more variations based on sexual recombination of genes. This has been indicated with micro-organisms, where those capable of sexual reproduction adapted more effectively and at a faster rate than asexual organisms. Thirdly, asexual reproduction is at a disadvantage, because any beneficial mutation can only be passed on through direct descendents. With sexual reproduction, the beneficial mutations have a greater ability to spread and the potential to combine with other, complementary mutations.

    The very first sexual reproduction is considered to have occurred around 2 billion years ago, sparking an increase in bio-diversity. It is thought that in the first form, sexual reproduction was "optional", a way of reproducing when the organism was experiencing harsh conditions. This is seen today in many species of yeast. Due to the advantages of sexual reproduction described above, sexual reproduction eventually took over asexual reproduction in many species, resulting in the mandatory - and extremely entertaining - activity that we know today.[3]



  • @'Tiffany':

    The ideal species, honestly, would be a futanari one. Just one gender. Anyone could hook up with anyone. The mating pool would open up over night from roughly 50% of the population as potential mates to 100%. From an evolutionary point of view, it'd be much more advantageous and I'm surprised we evolved with two genders rather than just the one.

    It's really rather simple as to why we have two genders. There are plenty of examples of one-gendered species in nature but their reproduction doesn't create new gene sequences, meaning that they are more susceptible to disease and other things that threaten survival. A double parent structure creates a situation in which different gene sequences come together to spawn a new one that is better armed against viruses/bacteria.

    So from an evolutionary point of view a monogendered species is definitely more of a curse than a blessing.



  • Traps are boys crossdressed as girls and it's a reverse trap if it's a girl dressed as a guy, I think.

    If it's not shemale on female you're watching gay porn and no you can't call that exclusively hetero. You can tell yourself that one of them looks like a girl and maybe that can even turn you on, but at the end of the day you're still watching one guy do another guy up the butt.

    A lot of them will actually go so far as to have breast implants because they aren't just cross dressers, they're pre-op transexuals. Most of those shemales in porn that look like girls and have implants and such, eventually they intend to go all the way. I feel sorry for those people honestly, especially how misunderstood they are by society.

    In the end, I think transexuals are the biggest failing of our species. I don't mean that in a bad way. What I mean is that as humans we're stuck with one gender, it's just how most species on earth are. But for anyone born wanting to be the opposite, that must be awful. Those people don't get a choice, they just got a bad roll.

    The ideal species, honestly, would be a futanari one. Just one gender. Anyone could hook up with anyone. The mating pool would open up over night from roughly 50% of the population as potential mates to 100%. From an evolutionary point of view, it'd be much more advantageous and I'm surprised we evolved with two genders rather than just the one.

    Anyways, I'm getting a little off topic here. If you like shemales then yeah it's homosexual to some extent but if you don't like guy on guy stuff with guys that actually look like men then it's not purely homosexual, it's more bisexual than anything. You should probably ask yourself whether you like them having a penis/balls or if it's just because they look like a girl that you like it. If it's just the latter then maybe you're just confused and you're trying to ignore the reality of the situation.

    Even if you wanted to go out and date a tranny, like a nice cute one with implants and all that, you wouldn't necessarily be homosexual. That is, unless men turn you on.

    They have a word nowadays for pretty much every kind of sexuality. I'm sure they even have terms for if you're into clowns and midgets or some shit. This is probably what you're looking for:

    Gynesexual/Gynephilic: attracted to females, women, and/or femininity

    I would assume that includes traps but I dunno. There's also this:

    Skoliosexual: attracted to genderqueer and transsexual people and expressions (people who aren’t identified as cisgender)

    But that seems to imply that it's exclusively that, so that might not be true.



  • I still consider futa with balls borderline tranny :P
    Not sure what you mean with traps though.


Log in to reply
 

Looks like your connection to NodeBB was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.